Myself also booked in tower G 3 year back and waiting for our dream home since then. Last week i visited nest for another flat for my relative but inventory were not available and most of the flat sold out. We already paid 1/2 of the money and if the situation come which mr. pankaj talks about than it will not possible for us to get money back only as with that money we can not purchase a small LIG in CR. Most of the people are single handed salaried including me, So we will obviously want our flat by any way. We are around 350 families who will be suffered because of this legal battle, not the builder. There are already various ir-regularities done by builder in existing towers, if these can be overlooked then why not this one if you think this(either F or G) is an additional tower because for us, this is not an additional tower.
I strongly support Mr. Pankaj solution where he give an idea that through leagl process we forced to recalculate super area of individual units and resident will pay amount as per new calculated area and people who had paid get their refund if it is possible to take the order of tower removal than this is also possible to get resident their money back and paid only for actually they will received on final hand over, not for false commitment. And stop commercial area right now as this is still not sold to innocent people and use that space for common area / park etc.
I request all honourable resident to rethink over the suggestion and give your views.
Tower G, F
Pankajjee, Praveenjee, RajeevJee, Slimjee, Lokeshjee,Rajatjee, Prithvijee as we already discussed on this. Lets meet next Sunday and discussed on this again. In the meantime try to add more buyers from F and G to give more strength how we can leave this?
Regards
Dhiren
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment