Thank you so much Krishnan Sir for your understanding. I can just hope that other residents will also try to understand our situation and will come up with more effective and sensible resolution.
Regards
Pankaj
From: V.Krishnan <vkram23@gmail.com>
To: pankaj pant <pantpankaj2002@yahoo.com>
Cc: The Nest RWA <info@thenestrwa.com>; "<allassotechresidents@googlegroups.com>" <allassotechresidents@googlegroups.com>; "the-nest-residents-welfare-association@googlegroups.com" <the-nest-residents-welfare-association@googlegroups.com>; assotech-group <AssotechNest@yahoogroups.com>; "assotechthenest@googlegroups.com" <assotechthenest@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, 14 April 2014 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Highglights of High Court Order (Dated 11.04.2014) for Apartment Owners
Dear Shri Pankaj
I am in complete agreement with your feelings which are justified.,
See below the news item that has appeared in TOI this morning:
| TOI Dated April 14th, 2014 Homebuyers in Supertech's Emerald Court want flats, not refund NOIDA: Homebuyers of Apex and Ceyane towers in the Emerald Court residential project have decided to move Supreme Court and reclaim their flats instead of receiving a refund of their payments from the developer. In a meeting with the developer's representative on Sunday morning, buyers pointed out that most of them had paid 95% of the amount for their flats. They blamed Noida Authority for granting permission to Supertech without considering the after-effects of the alleged illegalities. Vivek Sharma, a buyer who has booked a three BHK flat in Apex tower, said, "Majority of buyers are in favour of getting their dream home and don't want to get trapped in legal trouble. Most of us are working and do not have time to fight in courts. We hope that Supreme Court considers our plea and renders us relief." "We have not decided further course of action, but we are collecting required documents and permissions. We will take a stand soon," Sharma said. The developer, Supertech, has sought the support of buyers and formed a team to answer their queries. "For updates, buyers can call on 07838787863 or mail their queries to crm@supertechlimited.com. Buyers need not panic as we are considering every option that could bring us out of this situation. We need their cooperation. Apart from these two towers, all other projects are safe and there is no legal hurdle. Investments of buyers in any of our projects, is completely secure," said RK Arora, CMD, Supertech. "We have faced such situations in the past, but have overcome all hurdles with the help and cooperation of our trusted customers," Arora added. "We have put in our hard-earned money into the project. We want to reclaim our flat, not the refund," said Jamal Anwar, one of the buyers. An engineer by profession, Anwar said, "I have seen many buildings in Delhi-NCR with faulty structures. Those buildings are high risk but people are still allowed to stay there. As an engineer, my opinion is that these two towers are safe. By getting entangled in legal trouble, dreams of hundreds of families have been put at stake." |
There seems to be more hurt people in the Emerald Court Project and naturally they will go to Supreme Court for redressing their grievances, namely getting a stay against Allahabad HC's order of demolition of the two towers.
There is no doubt the developer has violated the building norms. But as the Engineers Mr. Anwar has said, violations have become the norms of building in DELHI and NCR. Illegal colonies spring up and then they get regularised.
In our Nest, let us assume a similar situation/ assessment comes up ( In fact we are heading towards such a situation), then only towers A, B and D are safe from demolition because there is no distance of 16 meters between B and C and between D and E. And if a Court orders that only 6 towers are to be built and the distance of 16 meters between two towers has to be maintained obviously the present C E and F towers have to be relocated spacing them all 16 metres apart while shelving the G tower.. This may satisfy legal provisions but will cause enormous distress to many. Yesterday in the General Body Meeting Mr. Aftab vehemently argued for removal of one tower from Nest..( saying only 6 should be there instead of the present plan of 7). You can imagine what would happen to others excepting those in tower A, B, and D
As owner of C-205, I certainly would not like my tower to be demolished. lest I would be devastated. I am sure some others in C tower will also agree. Same also would be in E and F and those who had booked in G tower will also like to get a flat rather than money- back with interest.
This is my personal opinion as owner of Flat C-205 and not as Convener of NESTRWA ( which position I could surrender any time, while I cannot surrender my ownership of my flat.
Mr. Pankaj, I fully and understand and respect your feelings.
Regards
V. Krishnan
c-205, 9811211083
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM, pankaj pant <pantpankaj2002@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear All,
FYI, I have booked a flat in tower G 2 yrs back. I came to know through these mails few days back only that residents are against the additional tower (either F or G) and they filed a case in consumer court and now plan is to go to High court. I also came to know that there are other major issues too in the society for eg. lift issue which is actually life threating issue.
In order to resolve these, few residents want to go legal. I am not sure whether I will get my home dream or not because of these legal battle but I just wanted to make a humble request to all residents to think about the seriouness of the matter if you go legal against the tower F or G. All the buyers of tower F or G would be in trouble, not the builder. Not every person is an investor, most of us are single handed salaried person who has already provided all savings to the builder and taken up the loan.
Your concern is about the commom area like tower F is built up on a central park. Can we go legal for this common area only along with other priority issue like lifts etc. Can't we ask and force the builder thruogh legal cource of action to reduce the super area for all existing residents because we all pay against the super area only. Can't we force the builder to build central park in place of "Commercial place".
I think we should not place a commercial tower and a residenetial tower at the same level. Residential tower is the basic needs while commercial not. We have invested our money for the basic need.
We people are waiting for a long time for our dream home and when it started, when we caught in loan, suddenly this issue came up and become a top priorty issue. Tower F, where one of our friend says that eariler as per plan, there was grean belt and it is illegal. I can see in the society except tower A, all towers are illegal, structure wise. I am seeing tower F presence for last 3 yrs, nobody raised this issue 3 yrs back. From day 1 of my booking we heard that there are 7 tower in the society, only few days back we came to know that earlier it was 6. Not sure in which year 1 more tower is introduced.
Definitly. you guys have rights to go legal but please think if you could negotiate on super area only along with other issues instead of demolishing the tower F or take a stay on tower G.
Regards
Pankaj
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 12/4/14, Akhil Pal Chhabra <75chhabra@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: Highglights of High Court Order (Dated 11.04.2014) for Apartment Owners
To: "Suresh" <suresh_hbti@rediffmail.com>
Cc: "The Nest RWA" <info@thenestrwa.com>, allassotechresidents@googlegroups.com, the-nest-residents-welfare-association@googlegroups.com, "assotech-group" <AssotechNest@yahoogroups.com>, assotechthenest@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 12 April, 2014, 9:30 AM
Supertech Row:
High court verdict will set an example, RWA
says
Highlights:
1. The approval and construction of the two new
towers was in complete violation of provisions of UP
Apartments Act 2010.
2. Noida Authority had given permission for
raising the heights of the two towers without maintaining
the mandatory distance of 16 metres from an adjoining
building block, making it 'unsafe, apart from blocking
air and light'.
3. The towers which were supposed to have only
24 floors were sanctioned 40 floors
4. Builder had not acquired the 'No
Objection Certificate' from members who had purchased a
unit in the building. "It is mandatory for builders to
get an NOC from existing buyers before making additional
constructions or changes"
Rgds
Akhil Chhabra
sent from my samsung Galaxy
On 12 Apr 2014 09:18,
"Akhil Pal Chhabra" <75chhabra@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thanks Suresh for sharing the order. Appreciate
your proactive approach.
Rgds
Akhil Chhabra
sent from my samsung Galaxy
On 12 Apr 2014 09:06,
"Chand Suresh" <suresh_hbti@rediffmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed copy of oder for apartment owners by
Hon'ble Allahabad High Court.
This is very critical and important orders and a lesson for
greedy builders. Hon'ble court has used very strong
language for demolishing the building(Read highlighted
portions)and order for refund of money to flat buyers.
Regards
Suresh
Get your own FREE
website, FREE
domain & FREE
mobile app with Company email.
Know
More >
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Chand Suresh"<suresh_hbti@rediffmail.com>
To: <allassotechresidents@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
Date:
Subject: Copy of Allahabad High Court Order (Dated
11.04.2014) for Apartment Owners
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed copy of oder for apartment owners by
Hon'ble Allahabad High Court.
This is very critical and important orders and a lesson for
greedy builders. Hon'ble court has used very strong
language for demolishing the building(Read highlighted
portions)and order for refund of money to flat buyers.
Regards
Suresh
Get your own FREE
website, FREE
domain & FREE
mobile app with Company email.
Know
More >
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Chand Suresh"<suresh_hbti@rediffmail.com>
To: <the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com>,<allassotechresidents@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
Date:
Subject: Copy of Allahabad High Court Order (Dated
11.04.2014) for Apartment Owners
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed copy of oder for apartment owners by
Hon'ble Allahabad High Court.
This is very critical and important orders and a lesson for
greedy builders. Hon'ble court has used very strong
language for demolishing the building(Read highlighted
portions)and order for refund of money to flat buyers.
Regards
Suresh
Get your own FREE
website, FREE
domain & FREE
mobile app with Company email.
Know
More >
--
This group email address has been created by
the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com (NRWA) for all residents to
come on a common platform, please send posts or messages you
feel are of importance / relevance to all. You may
add/request co-residents of the Nest to this group to get
all updates.
The Nest RWA email id remains same as
the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "All Assotech Residents" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
from it, send an email to allassotechresidents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
This group email address has been created by the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com (NRWA) for all residents to come on a common platform, please send posts or messages you feel are of importance / relevance to all. You may add/request co-residents of the Nest to this group to get all updates.
The Nest RWA email id remains same as the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "All Assotech Residents" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to allassotechresidents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Lokha Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu,
All Religions preach the same,
Work is Worship; Workplace is Temple
LOVE ALL SERVE ALL,
HELP EVER HURT NEVER
All Religions preach the same,
Work is Worship; Workplace is Temple
LOVE ALL SERVE ALL,
HELP EVER HURT NEVER
--
This group email address has been created by the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com (NRWA) for all residents to come on a common platform, please send posts or messages you feel are of importance / relevance to all. You may add/request co-residents of the Nest to this group to get all updates.
The Nest RWA email id remains same as the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "All Assotech Residents" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to allassotechresidents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
This group email address has been created by the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com (NRWA) for all residents to come on a common platform, please send posts or messages you feel are of importance / relevance to all. You may add/request co-residents of the Nest to this group to get all updates.
The Nest RWA email id remains same as the-nest-rwa@googlegroups.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "All Assotech Residents" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to allassotechresidents+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment